<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/</link>
	<description>The Church 2.0 ThinkTank</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25418</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25418</guid>
		<description>Exactly. We already have a AV player that we are not happy with. (It does not display native 16:9 content) so we would just be replacing it with the AppleTV. We are looking for something simple with a easy to use interface so that the learning curve for volunteers would be less steep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. We already have a AV player that we are not happy with. (It does not display native 16:9 content) so we would just be replacing it with the AppleTV. We are looking for something simple with a easy to use interface so that the learning curve for volunteers would be less steep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lunsford</title>
		<link>http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25412</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lunsford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25412</guid>
		<description>Thanks for explaing that Doug!  So Apple TV would more or less replace the computer for origination and allow you to schedule multiple media?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for explaing that Doug!  So Apple TV would more or less replace the computer for origination and allow you to schedule multiple media?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25383</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25383</guid>
		<description>Bill, We already have a switcher/scaler in place. One appleTV added to our control room would allow us to push the content to our lobby displays and/or our sanctuary for running announcements, videos, etc. We certainly would not be purchasing on per display.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, We already have a switcher/scaler in place. One appleTV added to our control room would allow us to push the content to our lobby displays and/or our sanctuary for running announcements, videos, etc. We certainly would not be purchasing on per display.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lunsford</title>
		<link>http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25376</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lunsford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25376</guid>
		<description>After looking at Apple's demo and information about Apple TV, I fail to see how this is cheaper (at $300 per box) then running the program for digital signage on a single computer (or whatever) and routing the output through a switcher/scaler.  From the information that I read, you would need a box(reciever) for each monitor you plan to use.  Going the other route, you already have the computer, the other investment would only be in a single switcher/scaler that does what you need (in the final analysis about the same total cost for a high quality device) and possibly a video amp depending on the distance of distribution.  Now at home...that's a different story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After looking at Apple&#8217;s demo and information about Apple TV, I fail to see how this is cheaper (at $300 per box) then running the program for digital signage on a single computer (or whatever) and routing the output through a switcher/scaler.  From the information that I read, you would need a box(reciever) for each monitor you plan to use.  Going the other route, you already have the computer, the other investment would only be in a single switcher/scaler that does what you need (in the final analysis about the same total cost for a high quality device) and possibly a video amp depending on the distance of distribution.  Now at home&#8230;that&#8217;s a different story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25354</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25354</guid>
		<description>We are considering AppleTV as a low cost digital signage device. With our graphics department generating graphics, we are thinking that a photo album would serve as playlist. We don't need remote capabilities or scheduling so this may be a perfect low cost solution until we move to a more robust solution like a oneboxHD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are considering AppleTV as a low cost digital signage device. With our graphics department generating graphics, we are thinking that a photo album would serve as playlist. We don&#8217;t need remote capabilities or scheduling so this may be a perfect low cost solution until we move to a more robust solution like a oneboxHD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lunsford</title>
		<link>http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25308</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lunsford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25308</guid>
		<description>Hey Gang!  I am intrigued by this post.  How do you plan to use this in your churches?  Are you connecting the monitors via LAN, WAN or something else altogether?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gang!  I am intrigued by this post.  How do you plan to use this in your churches?  Are you connecting the monitors via LAN, WAN or something else altogether?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25206</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvideoideas.com/2008/03/17/apple-tv/#comment-25206</guid>
		<description>We are considering a second location or video venue. I don't know much about the utilization of I-tunes for video but my understanding is that you can "broadcast" HD. My only hesitation in using such a device for an offsite location would be the quality level. Have you seen the quality and is it good enough for a second location video venue large screen projection? If it works, it would save us a boat load of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are considering a second location or video venue. I don&#8217;t know much about the utilization of I-tunes for video but my understanding is that you can &#8220;broadcast&#8221; HD. My only hesitation in using such a device for an offsite location would be the quality level. Have you seen the quality and is it good enough for a second location video venue large screen projection? If it works, it would save us a boat load of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
